Categories above include
Paid Advertisers.
Inclusion on Strugglingteens.com
does not
imply any endorsement
by Strugglingteens, LLC |
|
Paid Advertisement
Extended Insights
|
Posted:
Oct 17, 2005
12:38
|
|
POLL RESULTS - OCTOBER 2005
Paid Advertisement |
Poll Results:
A big thank you to everyone who participated in our online poll for August/September. We had 164 responses to the question if there should be a national regulatory system over emotional growth/therapeutic residential schools and programs.
Please revisit our new POLL for October and register your opinion. This month’s question asks: “For children, are psychotropic (mood altering) drugs used: Too Much; About Right; Not Enough; Unsure.” To make your opinion count, please click here and share your opinion. The only limit is you can not vote more than once a day.
The poll question for August/September asked “Should there be a national regulatory system over private schools and programs for struggling teens.” The responses were almost evenly split between yes and no. There were 75 responses (46%) for a national regulatory system, and 76 responses (46%) against, with only 13 (8%) being unsure. If this poll is representative of the public’s attitude, a big if since it is not a scientifically designed sample, the following are some possible interpretations, and observations based on my discussions with many people over the last several years.
From discussions I’ve had with people, I think the views of the yes votes were probably mostly for two reasons. One is that parents of kids with problems need all the help they can get, and they trust that regulators could provide some help by improving the quality of programs available to parents. The other is the regulators would be able to put pressure on programs that might be preying on parents through professional oversight, and eliminate dangerous and irresponsible practices.
The no votes would likely see the above as “Great Expectations,” that is, that the yes voters are automatically and naively assuming that the regulators would be wise and supportive. The no voters likely are people that feel that a national regulatory system would tend to favor something similar to the public systems that parents tried and were disappointed by before they choose a private parent-choice school or program. The no voters also likely would be those that see some national regulatory system as a system developed by politicians and administered by bureaucrats – a perspective that is a little scary. For example, if the system were set up to hire psychiatrists that favored medication therapy, then there would be pressure on all private programs to look more and more like hospitals under managed care, a system that is being criticized as being not very responsive to the needs of many teens with emotional/behavioral problems.
The almost even split between the two viewpoints suggests that the public is widely split, and we are a long way from consensus. Also, that the proposal has enough interest that it should be thoroughly debated, and all aspects studied. We at Woodbury Reports would be very interested in publishing submissions on a variety of viewpoints on this proposal as part of a public debate.
Lon Woodbury, MA, IECA
Certified Educational Planner
Woodbury Reports Inc.
www.strugglingteens.com
Poll Comments:
Oct. 6, 2005: As soon as the bureaucrats and politicians get involved, the quality of service and facilities go down. Also, the parents lose way too much control over the situation and usually the poor parents are the ones that know what's best for their troubled kids. It's good to have a large variety of facilities because parents can decide what's best for the individual needs of their own unique kids. No cookie cutter facilities enabling the politicos to further line their pockets at the public's expense. Our government is already controlled by the drug companies who have brainwashed and intimidated the medical community. I don't want them meddling in the care of my children. I vote NO!
Oct. 6, 2005: I think the definition of what would be regulated, and by whom, it key - I do believe there should be a way to regulate the safety of a program, but allow the programs to decide their model and program specialty within those safety boundaries. Defining "safe", of course, is another issue. The government should not get involved, as we are not funded by or overseen by government agencies - and want to avoid being part of such.
Oct. 6, 2005: I think that there is so much bad parenting today.....narcissistic couples who give birth without the realization of the commitment. They go thru breathing classes, music played to the fetus, want epidurals so the mother has the least amount of discomfort, and then shortly after the child is born, they off it to day care They want it all and to experience everything so they reproduce, then once the child is born they spend more time on careers and lifestyle than the child. High divorce rates and single parenting add to this sad saga for the child......a child is like wet cement, everything leaves an impression.....they are not born dysfunctional.....environment, love and security make the difference. Society adds to the matter of the "me" generation and the children are then medicated to comply with dysfunctional homes and a permissive society.
There is so little of the extended family. The society we live in is so mobile and states have intervened in grandparents rights of participation in a child's life. These children today have no place to go other than on the streets or into themselves for their needs to be met.....they are screaming for a sense of belonging. I am sick of hearing parents "poor me" with an out of control child stories.....the parents are sympathized with because they pay the bills. These schools, etc. are thriving because of bad parenting and the parents get the sympathy for their "difficult child."
I think they need adult "Boot Camps," "Wilderness Camps" and "Therapeutic Boarding Schools." If this came in vogue, we might have a more mentally healthy society.
CLICK HERE to add your comments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[E-mail story]](http://www.strugglingteens.com/images/page/storytools_mail.gif "E-mail this story to a friend"){kind=small}
![[Print story]](http://www.strugglingteens.com/images/page/storytools_print.gif "Version of this story optimized for printing"){kind=small}